23 August 2019, 13:15:42 *

Login with username, password and session length
Welcome to War and Tactics!    War and Tactics Forum is currently undergoing some modifications that might disable features you are used to. This is unabvoidable as we have to update the forum engine to a new structure that is incompatible with many of the features we had used so far. The good news: WaT will be more secure and stable, and most of the features we uninstalled will be a natural part of the new structure anyway. For the rest we will be looking for solutions. (APR 23, 2018)
   
  Home   Forum   Help ! Forum Rules ! Search Calendar Donations Login Register Chat  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Share this topic on Del.icio.usShare this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on MySpaceShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on TechnoratiShare this topic on TwitterShare this topic on Yahoo
Author Topic: The Imperial Japanese Navy and WWII  (Read 6586 times)
Mad Russian
Guest

« on: 21 May 2009, 04:20:10 »
ReplyReply

IJN Imperial Japanese Navy / ( Nihon Kaigun )



The evolution of Japanese naval power in the five decades leading up to World War II was one of the most significant trends of the 20th Century. The Imperial Fleet was founded in the wake of the Meiji Restoration in 1868, which unified Japan. Although they lacked the infrastructure of Europe or the United States, over the next forty years the Japanese managed to construct a navy that was strong enough to decisively defeat a regional power, China, as well as a great European power, Russia.

Japan had desired to be the most powerful nation in the Far East since the 1890s. As part of that plan, Japan had to expand to acquire areas that were rich in natural resources not available in Japan and to form a protective outer ring away from the home islands. In need of raw materials and new markets, Japan fought China in the Sino-Japanese War in 1894-95. Fought in Korea and Manchuria, the Imperial Army and Imperial Navy won numerous victories, forcing China to sue for peace, in which China ceded Korea and Formosa and paid a large indemnity. In 1905, ships of the Combined Fleet, under the command of Fleet Admiral Heihachiro Togo, sailed from Sasebo to engage Russia’s Baltic Fleet. Admiral Togo’s victory during the Battle of Tsushima is a classic in naval history. With victories over the Russians and Chinese in the late 1890s/early 1900s, Japan had obtained Formosa, Korea, the Kuril Islands, and parts of Manchuria. As an ally at the end of World War I, Japan was mandated from Germany possession of the Marshall Islands, the Caroline Islands, and the Mariana Islands.

By 1920 Tokyo had the third largest fleet in the world. Despite continuing industrial inferiority — and with an economy that was one-ninth the size of America and heavily dependent on imports of raw materials — Japan was sufficiently powerful to directly challenge the US Navy in the Pacific by 1941.

The political emergence of the Imperial Japanese Navy between 1868 and 1922 contradicts the popular notion that the navy was a 'silent,' apolitical service. Politics, particularly budgetary politics, became the primary domestic focus — if not the overriding preoccupation — of Japan's admirals in the prewar period. As the Japanese polity broadened after 1890, navy leaders expanded their political activities to secure appropriations commensurate with the creation of a world-class blue-water fleet.

The Imperial Japanese Navy worked the Japanese body politic more successfully than almost any other organization between 1868 and 1918. It did so to transform itself from a motley collection of ships into the third most powerful navy in the world. But it also strengthened or at least further legitimated parliamentary democracy, demonstrated the potential political effectiveness of mass propaganda and pageantry, fostered nationalism, and enlarged Japan's empire toward the South Seas in perception as well as reality.

The navy's sophisticated political efforts included lobbying oligarchs, coercing cabinet ministers, forging alliances with political parties, occupying overseas territories, conducting well-orchestrated naval pageants, and launching spirited propaganda campaigns. These efforts succeeded: by 1921 naval expenditures equaled nearly 32 percent of the country's total budget. The navy made waves at sea and on shore, and in doing so significantly altered the state, society, politics, and empire in prewar Japan.

Inter-service rivalry over budget allocations between the Japanese Imperial Navy and the Imperial Army played a crucial role in the genesis of World War Two in the Pacific. The adoption of a nanshin ("southward advance") strategy by the Navy may be explained as an attempt to maximize its budget leading directly to the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941.

The Japanese navy emulated foreign practices and evolved innovative concepts of its own. Tokyo looked to the world’s most powerful fleet—the Royal Navy—as the model for modernization. Japan purchased the best naval technology and to build an impressive domestic arms industry. By the early 20th century, this process yielded a fleet that was better organized, trained, and equipped than any other in the region.

When Japan was locked in combat with Russia in 1905 and looked for asymmetric ways to defeat the superior Russian navy and started acquiring submarines. Their first five submarines were purchased from the United States. After the war with Russia, Japan developed its own submarines and continued to improve them, developing numerous types including seaplane carriers, mine warfare submarines, and midget submarines [By 1941 Japan had 65 fleet submarines, and the US Pacific Fleet had only 23].

The Washington Treaty of 1922 initially limited the Japanese to 315,000 tons of capital ships, 60% of the 525,000 tons allowed to the United States. The United States and Britain had to reduce their navies (the United States scrapped 15 battleships and cruisers that had been under construction) while the Japanese had to build up to get to their “limitation.” With the stroke of a pen, Japan reduced the size of the US Navy while being allowed to increase the size of its own navy. This was followed by the 1930 London Treaty that further restricted Japanese naval strength by limiting the Japanese to 108,400 tons of heavy cruisers, 60.23% of the American heavy cruiser force, to 100,450 tons of light cruisers, 70% of the American allowance, and 52,700 tons of submarines.

The Sino-Japanese and Russo-Japanese wars spawned a unique Japanese approach to naval thought that dominated strategic and tactical discussion up to World War II. Forbidden by treaty from matching America quantitatively, Japan sought to exploit operational and technological niches to inflict disproportionate damage. Under the rubric of “using a few to conquer many,” the Japanese developed comparative advantages such as long-range torpedo combat, night operations by surface units, and a tactic of outranging the U.S. fleet with subsurface, surface, and air forces. The Imperial Navy also designed and produced weapons needed to implement its strategy. During the early 1930s it deployed the first oxygen-propelled (Type 93) torpedo, whose range, speed, and payload far exceeded American and British models. In 1940 it fielded the Mitsubishi A6N “Zeke,” the world’s foremost carrier-based fighter.

While Japan lagged behind the United States and Great Britain in high-technology systems like radar, it built less-advanced sensors, including superior optics and searchlights. By 1940 the Japanese were much the equal of their British and American foes in training, technological innovation, and tactical proficiency.

The Imperial Japanese Navy was a pioneer in naval aviation, having commissioned the world's first built-from-the-keel-up carrier, the 'Hosho'. Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, it experimented with its carriers, perfecting their design and construction. As result, by 1941 it possessed a fantastically effective naval aviation force.

In 1907, the same year the US Navy began working on its Orange Plan for rescuing the Philippines from Japan, the United States became for the Japanese navy the "budgetary enemy." Despite the fact that Japan had been an ally during World War I, American war planning in the interwar years focused on war with Japan, and Japanese planning focused on the United States. In June 1940 Japan sought and received the French Vichy government's permission to land forces in French Indochina. Japanese Prime Minister Matsuoka Yôsuke announced the idea of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere (Dai-to-a Kyoeiken, variants: Dai Toa Kyoeiken, Daitoa Kyoeiken, Daitoa="Greater East Asia", Kyoeiken="Co-Prosperity Sphere") in August 1940. In September 1940 Japanese troops started occupying northern parts of French Indochina.

President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s administration reacted by placing an embargo on steel and scrap iron from the United States, an event the Japanese termed an “unfriendly act.” In July 1941 Japan demanded more Indochinese bases, and when Japan moved to occupy these bases, the United States, Great Britain, and the Netherlands froze Japanese assets. They also imposed an all-out embargo against Japan, including the export of oil. Japan imported all of the oil it used and had now lost access to almost all of its sources.

In August 1941 Japanese war planning increased as the military leaders realized that war with the United States was more likely everyday. In response to the American embargo, the Imperial Staff developed the “Southern Operation,” a plan for capturing the industrial rich Dutch East Indies and Malaya. Japan realized this action would force the United States and Great Britain into war, so the plan also called for seizing the American-held Philippines and Guam and the British possessions of Hong Kong and Burma. Once the southern areas were secured, Japan would occupy strategic positions in the Pacific and fortify them, thus forming a tough defensive perimeter around Japan and its newly acquired resource areas. Once the perimeter was secure, Japan would try to negotiate for peace. The planners thought it would take six months to accomplish all the tasks and had to be free of interference from the American Navy during that time. Yamamoto had the plan for ensuring that the US Pacific Fleet would not interfere for six months.

On December 7, 1941, Japanese navy airplanes raided the Pearl Harbor (Hawaii) base of the United States. The American Pacific fleet was almost completely annihilated. The purpose of this action was to destroy America's main fleet and then secure sea control in the Pacific. On the same day, the Japanese army landed in Malaysia and moved towards Singapore. Japan declared war on Britain and the United States, calling this a "War of Self-Defense and Existence" [Jison Jiei Senso]. The Japanese government named this war the Great East Asian War (Daitowa Senso). After the war, the Americans banned the use of the term Greater East Asian War and therefore it is called the Pacific War (Taiheiyo Senso). Japan claimed that this was a war of self-defense by Japan, and to establish the "Great East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere" in order to break down the stranglehold of the American and European countries. Germany and Italy also declared war against the United States.

At the opening of the Pacific War in 1941, the Japanese Combined Fleet comprised 10 battleships; 10 aircraft carriers; 38 cruisers, heavy and light; 112 destroyers; 65 submarines; and numerous auxiliary warships of lesser size. Carriers would roam the Pacific with near impunity, destroying their opponents at will.

But Japan failed to effectively harness its national resources for a war with the United States. Instead its army remained committed to a conflict in China, while its navy became increasingly enamored of an advance into Southeast Asia. In planning such a campaign, the naval leadership fell prey to circular reasoning. In the climate of worsening Japanese-American relations during the late 1930s, the Imperial Navy expected Washington to reduce or eliminate oil exports. Since the United States was its major petroleum supplier, Tokyo would be obliged to look to the Netherlands East Indies. But conquering the oil fields of the Indies would embroil Japan in a conflict with Washington that it could not win without access to those oil fields.

Japan developed the concept of “Kantai Kessen” (decisive fleet battle). Kantai Kessen assumed that any war with the United States would be primarily a naval war. Therefore, Japan wanted the fight to be near the Japanese home islands. Japanese naval planning had called for the destruction of American naval strength in a climactic gun duel between battleships - a belief firmly embraced by the other major navies of the day. As technological advances increased the operating range of submarines and aircraft, the operational theater for the interception-attrition operations and the decisive battle had moved eastward, further from Japanese home waters.Throughout the 1920s the Japanese expected the decisive battle to occur near the Ryukyu Islands. By 1940 the Japanese were planning for the decisive battle to be fought in the Marshall Islands.

Japan’s traditional defensive strategy was to keep the Combined Fleet in home waters, waiting to attack the US Pacific Fleet as it sailed into the Western Pacific to liberate the Philippines. The Pacific Fleet had to be destroyed in a decisive fleet engagement to force the Americans to negotiate for peace with Japan. But Japan lacked the industrial base to support a long war against the United States. If Japan did not win in 1942 the United States would build up sufficient military strength for a powerful counterattack beginning in 1943.

The desire for a quick, decisive victory led Tokyo to neglect unglamorous but vital dimensions of operations such as logistics and personnel policy. Because its leadership assumed that a war with America would be decided by a few decisive battles, the Japanese ignored such capabilities as commerce protection and antisubmarine warfare, deficiencies which became crippling vulnerabilities in a long war of attrition.

Due to the distances involved, logistics was critical to Japan. Japan maintained its ports and navy yards throughout the home islands. They maintained larger bases at locations, including Yokosuka, Kure, Sasebo, Maizuru, and Bako. These bases could provide all required services for ships up to and including overhaul. There were many smaller yards and bases throughout the home islands that provided more limited support. Japan, like the United States, depended on forward bases for their ships. Their base on Truk Island was the most advanced, with services including refuel, rearming, and repairing. Other bases away from the home islands were Saigon and Formosa. Like the United States, Japan’s ships could also refuel while under way, but it was not a practiced skill and was very rarely used. The Japanese navy had built a lot of ships, but it, like the United States, did not have enough logistics ships to properly support its fleets.

For five months after Pearl Harbor, the Imperial Japanese Navy's Combined Fleet moved across the Pacific with virtual impunity. The Battle of Coral Sea (7–8 May 1942) was the first “Carrier vs. Carrier” battle, and the first of the Pacific War’s six fights between opposing aircraft carrier forces. Japan lost the light Carrier SHOHO, the large Carrier SHOKAKU was heavily damaged, and the ZUIKAKU air wing was heavily damaged. The LEXINGTON was lost to spreading fires, and YORKTOWN was damaged by bombs and returned to Pearl Harbor for repairs.

The Battle of Midway, 4-7 June 1942, represented the strategic high water mark of Japan's Pacific War. Prior to this action, Japan possessed general naval superiority over the United States and could usually choose where and when to attack. Midway cost Japan four irreplaceable fleet carriers, while only one of the three US carriers present was lost. After Midway, the two opposing fleets were essentially equals, and the United States soon took the offensive. On 7 August 1942, the first US land offensive of WWII commenced, with the US Marines landing on Guadalcanal and Tulagi, Solomon Islands. Japanese victory was impossible by late 1942, but the Japanese leadership continued fighting for another three years.

From the time of the naval battles around Gudalcanal in November 1942 until the Marianas campaign in June 1944, there were no fleet to fleet engagements of consequence. The Leyte (Philippines) landings on 20 October 1944 brought on the desperate, almost suicidal, last great sortie of the Imperial Japanese Navy. Its plan for the Battle for Leyte Gulf included a feint by a northern force of planeless heavy attack carriers to draw away the American warships protecting the landings. On 24 October 1944 planes from American carriers sank four of the Japanese carriers.

By 1945, Japan was at war with more than fifty nations -- more than half the world.


PRIMARY SOURCES:

History of the IJN in WWII
Logged
Mad Russian
Guest

« Reply #1 on: 21 May 2009, 04:35:35 »
ReplyReply

Naming of IJN Ships

Very little has been written in English about the naming of Japanese ships. English readers encounter the Romanized versions of IJN ship names in reading about the IJN during World War 2, but will not find a comprehensive monograph on the topic, and certainly will not find much information on names of IJN ships before the World War 2 period. Additionally, currently available lists of IJN ship names provide the meanings of IJN ship names, in some cases referring to the name in terms that mask the actual perception of the name to the Japanese who viewed the names in their native language. This brief monograph will seek to fill in these gaping holes in the literature, and is the first in a growing body of webpages that will provide the entire picture.
Early Practices

The conventions and rules for naming Imperial Japanese Navy ships went through a number of phases before settling on the system used during World War 2.

When the IJN was first established, the practice of naming ships involved the Minister of the Navy submitting proposals to the Emperor for approval. For ships given to the IJN by the Shogunate or various clans, the original names were retained.

After the establishment of the cabinet form of government (December 12, 1885), the Minister of the Navy submitted proposed ship names to the Emperor. This procedure remained in effect until 1891, after which the proposals were submitted to the Emperor via the Lord Chamberlain. The usual practice was to submit two names for each ship, from which the Emperor selected the name to be used. The Emperor is said to have made his own choice of name in some cases.

Starting on March 23, 1867, the task of naming torpedo boats was entrusted to the Minister of the Navy, with no requirement approval from the Emperor. Destroyers naming was done this way after May 16, 1902, and from January 16, 1921 all ships other than battleships, battlecruisers, and cruisers were named by the Minister of the Navy. The new simplified system merely required the Minister of the Navy to name a ship and report the name immediately to the Emperor.

Captured Ships

Ships captured in the Sino-Japanese War (1894-1895) retained their names, however with pronunciations adjusted to the Japanese pronunciations of the original Chinese characters [Note 1].

Ships captured during the Russo-Japanese War (1904-1905) presented a different problem, since they lacked convenient kanji characters. Japanese ship names were applied in accordance with normal practice at the time, with consideration occasionally given to other factors.

For example, the battleship Imperator Nicolai I was renamed the Iki and the Russian coastal defense ship General-Admiral Apraxin was renamed the Okinoshima, both of these names being related to the location of naval battles.

The destroyer Bedovy was renamed Satsuki, a name taken from the old name of the month of May, in which the Battle of the Sea of Japan took place.

Some names were selected for the similarity in pronunciation to the original Russian name. The transport Angara was renamed Anegawa for this reason.

The Beginnings of Order

Until about 1904 there were no particular official naming conventions, names of mountains and the like being used, in addition to names of provinces, islands, rivers, famous locations, and normal words. A rough listing of the categories of names looks something like the following.
 
Category      Examples
Mountain names    Chokai, Akagi, Maya
Province/country names    Yamato, Musashi, Izumo
Island names    Chishima, Yaejima
River names    Tenryu, Tone
Famous Locations    Akashi, Hashidate
Elegant names for Japan    Fuso, Akitsushima
Words    Nisshin, Yakumo, Chihaya
Meteorological phenomena    Harusame, Fubuki
Bird names    Sokaku, Kari

Because the beginning of the Meiji Period (1868-1911) so many ships relinquished to the IJN by the Shogunate and regional clans, many early IJN ships had words rendered in "Japanese-style Chinese pronunciation" as names.

Yamamoto Naming Proposal

On April 23, 1895, the then Minister of the Navy, Yamamoto Gonbei, wrote and sent to the Emperor a proposed system for naming IJN ships.

   1. In general, names of battleships and first class cruisers shall be selected from names of provinces within the Empire or from names of shrines traditionally dedicated to the protection of the nation.
   2. Names of other warships shall be selected from names of country and provinces within the Empire.
   3. In addition, names can be selected as appropriate in accordance with previous practice, such as the names Shikishima, Asahi, Akitsushima, Yashima, and Fuso, without regard to ship type.

After some refinements, involving such details such as how long after a ship is stricken is its name usable for a new ship, the guidelines that would basically remain intact until the demise of the IJN were established.
The World War 2 Period
The system used through the end of World War 2 is as follows.
 
Ship Type    Source(s) of Names
Battleships    Country/province names
Battlecruisers    Mountain names
First class cruisers    Mountain names
Second class cruisers        River names
Coast defense ships    Old names retained (no new construction)
First class destroyers       Meteorological phenomena
Second class destroyers    Plant names
Torpedo boats       Bird names
Submarines    Numbers

At the time of the appearance of such ship types as aircraft carriers, submarine tenders, and minelayers, since many ships were conversions from other ship types, no particular naming standard was established at first.

Subsequently the following naming practices were adopted to accommodate new ship types.
 
Ship Type    Source(s) of Names
Aircraft carriers       Mythical animal/bird names (Chinese style pronunciation)
Country/mountain names (after 1943)

Submarine tenders    Whale-related names (Chinese style pronunciation)
Minelayers, seaplane tenders, etc.    Words or retention of previously used names
Training cruisers     Shinto shrine names (such as Katori) after 1940
New escorts (kaibokan)    Island names (such as Shumushu) after 1940
Type A (Ko) destroyers after June 1943    Names related to rain and tides/currents
Type B (Otsu) destroyers after June 1943    Names related to the moon, wind, clouds, and seasons
Type C (Hei) destroyers after June 1943    Names related to wind
Only one destroyer of this type was completed, Shimakaze (Island Wind)

Type D (Tei) destroyers after June 1943    Plant names


Categories of Ship Names: An Overview
The entire universe of IJN ship names can be placed into the following ten major categories (Katagiri 1993).
 
Category      Remarks
Country/province names    Most of these names are either old names of various provinces of Japan (in use before the Meiji period) or alternate (and usually elegant) names for Japan as a whole.
Mountain names    
River names    
Chinese style words
   These names are Japanese words written usually with two Chinese characters and pronounced using a pronunciation borrowed from Chinese when kanji characters were introduced into Japan.
Native Japanese words; names of cities and famous spots in Japan    
Meteorological phenomena    
Further classifiable into sub-categories of names related, for example, to the moon, clouds, tides, wind, and the like.
Plant names    
Bird names    
This class contains existing birds, in contrast to the names of mythical birds used for some aircraft carriers.
Island names    
Other geographic features (e.g., capes, peninsulas, straits)    


Romanized Name Rendering

Since no Romanization of Japanese has any legal or official validity in Japan, Romanization is more an issue for non-Japanese reading and writing about the IJN than for the Japanese themselves. Of the three systems [Note 2] of Romanization available, most publications in English use the Hepburn system of Romanization, which is purported to be the easiest for English speakers to use in ascertaining the approximate pronunciation of Japanese words.

A number of minor problems arise when dealing with IJN ship names via the medium of their Romanized renderings. For example, there were two distinct ship names rendered as Fuji in Roman letters, but written entirely differently in Japanese orthography. One (written with two kanji characters) is named for Mount Fuji, the other (written with an entirely different single kanji) is named for the wisteria tree.
 

Fuji
(Mount Fuji)    Fuji
(Wisteria tree)

The names are pronounced exactly the same in spoken Japanese, but the orthography provides an instant distinction between the two names when written in Japanese.
 
Meanings of IJN Ship Names
We sometimes see lists of IJN ship names with glosses provided for the overall names or for the individual ideographs (kanji) used to write the name in Japanese orthography. These glosses, while of some interest in describing the way a non-Japanese might view IJN ship names, provide little insight into how they were perceived and understood by the Japanese themselves.

A good example are the names of rivers and mountains when used as ship names. The cruiser Aoba might be glossed as "green leaf" but the Japanese wouldn't think of doing so, because Aoba is treated as a unit, without regard to the individual meanings of the constituent characters. The Japanese do not go through the meanings of the individual characters in perceiving this name. Although much attention is paid by non-Japanese to the fact that the individual kanji characters themselves have meanings (i.e., are ideographic), in the sense of proper names of geographic features often used as IJN ship names, the characters are basically logographic (indicating words--in this case proper names) independent of and not relying on the meanings of the characters.

With noted exceptions, this is similar to many city names in the US, for example. Upon encountering the name Indianapolis, few people need to think of this as an "Indian city" to understand the city being referred to. Similarly, New York does not often conjure up images of a new version of the town York in England.



PRIMARY SOURCES:


Naming of IJN Ships in WWII

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Unique Hits: 26033927 | Sitemap
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
TinyPortal v0.9.8 © Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!


Google visited last this page 29 December 2018, 03:28:35